Here is a proof. In my recent post about me finally understanding why some people were telling Bitcoin Cash is the real Bitcoin I was accused that I was supporting Bitcoin Cash for many years, and I am posting this to get more upvotes.

So here is a proof I was not a supporter of Bitcoin Cash. https://twitter.com/walerikus/status/971669244416090113?s=20

I share my thoughts not because of upvotes, but to show how difficult it is for a newcomer to understand the blocksize debate, and throughout anti onchain scalability propaganda to come to sensible conclusions.

In the beginning I was anti BCH, then I accepted it as an alternative way to scale Bitcoin, and only recently I came to the same conclusion, that Bitcoin Cash devs had the right way to scale Bitcoin, I have also re-evaluated my thoughts on forks, because it is actually a split where 2 forked chains emerge from a single chain. That means BTC also forked, since it is not following some of the basic standards of the original protocol design, I can relate to what Bitcoin Cash proponents were telling.

And since I am interacting with people in various crypto chats, and see how most of them think Bitcoin Cash is a cheap copy, many are ignorant and don't know the details of blocksize debate, many hate Bitcoin Cash. I am raising concerns because of the effective anti big blocks propaganda, if not this I would probably not even pay a big attention to Bitcoin Cash, even though after a little research in the beginning I was supporting the big blocks solution to scale Bitcoin, but for a long time I was still ignoring Bitcoin Cash, not even thinking to invest in it, only recently it became clear to me that BTC devs don't even consider increasing the block size, and how LN is full of points of failures and it is nowhere close as reliable as blockchain network, I finally totally switched into supporting Bitcoin Cash only in 2021, and started actively investing in it.