If increasing the blocksize leads to more centralization there could still be a baseline increase that could happen each year without any additional centralization due to the increase in technology speed/capactiy

The idea that a cutting edge technology has not increased its capacity in over 10 years is pretty insane. If centralization is a concern why not as least do a baseline blocksize increase every few years as technology allows for it? (you know just like Satoshi planned)

Until I see someone produce an analysis that shows what level of blocksize increase leads to what level of centralization it's all hand waving. The idea that any increase in blocksize would create an irreparable change to centralization is false on its face.